BNY dismissed from Epstein case, but BofA must face some claims

By

Use this page to get oriented quickly.

The brief below is a reading aid. The original source material and source link remain the governing reference.

Operational Brief

• Bank of America will face a claim for obstructing the enforcement of trafficking laws. • The lender was not found to have failed in upholding anti-money laundering and know-your-customer standards.

Why It Matters for Texas Credit Unions

The article does not mention Texas, TCUD, or any Texas-specific entities. It focuses on Bank of America facing claims related to a specific case involving trafficking laws.

Who this most likely affects

Bounded site guidance: This item is most likely relevant for credit unions with BSA/AML, fraud, or payments oversight responsibilities.

Why this fit: The source language points to anti-money-laundering, sanctions, fraud, or suspicious-activity obligations.

This is site guidance, not a formal determination. Banking Dive and the original source material remain the governing reference.

Private Follow-Up

Save this for follow-up.

Sign in to keep a private note, target date, or reminder for this item.

Sign in to save this item Create account

Original Source Material

A judge rejected allegations that Bank of America failed to uphold anti-money laundering and know-your-customer standards. The lender, however, will face a claim that it obstructed the enforcement of trafficking laws.